Know What You Need, Know What You Want, and Know the Difference

By Infinite Creation Editorial Team · 3 August 2026 · 10 min read

A first feature runs on decisions. You will make hundreds of them a day, most under time pressure, many with incomplete information. Directors who finish with a film worth watching are the ones who worked out in advance which decisions matter and which do not.

The short version: separate what you need from what you want. You will get a fraction of what you want. You have to get all of what you need. Prep, casting, coverage and sound all exist to protect the second list from the first.

One distinction sits underneath all of this

Your head holds a version of the film. The screen will hold a different one. Aiming for an exact match between them wastes your day.

Split every scene into two lists before you shoot it. What you need is the material the scene fails without. What you want is everything else. On a good day you get the whole first list and some of the second. On a bad day you get the first list only, and the scene still works.

First-time directors invert this constantly. Four hours on the shot you love, then eight hours on the thirty-two shots you need to finish the day. The shot you love turns out beautiful. The day turns out broken.

Everything below is a version of the same sorting exercise.

Prep buys you decisions, not shots

Bong Joon-ho draws every shot of every film before he shoots. For Parasite he sketched close to the entire film, with camera moves noted beside the dialogue. The storyboards were later published as a book.

His own explanation deserves attention. Bong has said storyboarding is not necessary for making good films, and he worries the structure removes some of the spontaneity a set produces. He storyboards because he gets anxious without it.

Take the method and the reason together. Storyboards do not make a film good. They remove a whole class of decision from the shooting day, which leaves you free to spend attention on the decisions still open. A shot list does the same work at a tenth of the effort. Either beats arriving with neither.

What this looks like in practice:

Bong Joon-ho started in a university film club, and the preparation habit predates the budgets.

Casting is the highest-leverage decision you make

Robert Altman said in 1977 his creative work was ninety percent finished once the casting was finished. Versions of the same line get attributed to Elia Kazan, William Wyler, John Ford, John Huston and Martin Ritt, which tells you how widely directors agree on it.

Chloe Zhao pushes the idea further. She writes from conversations with real people, then casts those people as versions of themselves and encourages them to improvise. Her debut feature generated more than a hundred hours of improvised footage. She describes looking for honest performances rather than perfect ones.

Two things follow for a first feature.

Cast for the performance the film needs. Casting around a schedule produces a film built around a schedule.

Shoot your most experienced actors first when your cast is uneven. While the stronger actor works, the less experienced one rehearses off camera against real performance. They arrive at their own coverage warmer. Reverse the order and you burn their best energy on rehearsal.

Zhao worked this way before the studio films, and the approach survived the move.

On the day, a decision beats the right decision

Clint Eastwood shoots from the first take wherever the take holds. Crews call him One-Take Clint. He does not shout action or cut, a habit from his western years when loud noise startled the horses. He stands beside the camera, speaks at a normal volume, and tells the actors when to stop. His productions finish ahead of schedule and under budget.

The transferable part is not the take count. The transferable part is momentum. A set with forward motion holds its energy. A set waiting for someone to reach certainty loses it.

People will bring you questions with no correct answer. Pick one. Say it out loud. Move on. The choice becomes the film and the film absorbs it. Perfectionism at this specific moment costs more than a mediocre call, because the mediocre call is usually invisible in the finished cut and the lost hour never is.

Your plan will break, and the break is not the disaster

The mechanical sharks built for Jaws were designed for fresh water and then put in the sea. Salt water corroded the pneumatics and the sharks failed constantly.

Steven Spielberg had a monster movie without a working monster. He shot around it. The camera took the shark's point of view. The surface of the water carried the threat. Actors reacted to something the audience never saw. Withholding the shark produced the tension the film became known for.

Read the story accurately. Spielberg did not stand on the beach and decide his broken equipment was a gift. He solved the day in front of him, then the next one, and the solutions accumulated into a style. The lesson is about response speed rather than optimism.

You will lose a location, an actor, a crew member, or a day. Adapt rather than argue with reality. Execution under constraint beats a great plan you never shot.

Shoot the things existing only while your actors are there

Coverage carries a bad reputation among people who believe a serious director shoots the finished edit and nothing else. The belief has cost a lot of first features.

Get a master of every scene. Get one thing worth cutting away to. Five extra minutes on the day costs far less than a week of problem solving in post, and you find out your original plan feels wrong only after the material stops arriving.

Inserts run the other way. A hand on a doorknob, a phone screen, a coffee cup going down. They are the least important shots of your day and they consume cast and crew time at full rate. Commercial work trains you to perfect them. Resist the training. Shoot them later without talent wherever the shot allows it, and shoot the ones needing an actor while the actor stands there.

Leave heads and tails on every take. Roll before the actor starts and keep rolling after they finish. Actors need the runway to arrive in the scene rather than beginning it cold. Editors need the handles to choose where a cut lands.

Sound outlives your picture

Eryn Newman and Norbert Schwarz ran two experiments published in Science Communication in 2018. They presented identical conference talks, and identical radio interviews from a science programme, in high or low audio quality.

The content never changed. The ratings did. Listeners hearing the low-quality version judged the talk worse, the speaker less intelligent, the speaker less likeable, and the research less important. Same words, same argument, worse microphone.

Your audience will do the same arithmetic on your film without noticing they are doing it. No director has ever finished an independent feature and regretted paying too much attention to audio.

The asymmetry is practical. Bad location sound follows you through every day of the post schedule and survives into the finished film. One badly framed shot does not. Budget your attention accordingly, and read why sound is doing more work than most first films let it.

Something is in your frame whether you chose it or not

Low budget features skip production design more often than any other department. The camera still records whatever sits behind your actor.

The bar here is intention rather than money. Remove the objects contradicting the scene. Add two or three belonging to the character. Pick a wall deliberately. Semi-intentional beats accidental by a wide margin, and audiences read the difference without being able to name it.

You are running a small organisation

The crew reads you continuously. Your calm becomes theirs, and so does your panic. Set the standard for creativity, collaboration and professionalism early, because the standard on day one is the standard for the shoot.

Lean on the team you assembled. A director curates taste and makes final calls. Directors treating the role as sole authorship waste the best ideas available to them.

Specific operational things worth planning:

Watch what you shot

Have your editor cut as you shoot if the budget reaches. Real-time feedback tells you a scene is not working while you retain the ability to fix it.

Watch dailies every day at minimum. Dailies teach you your own habits faster than any other feedback available during production.

Ask your DP to grab cutaways and inserts whenever a gap opens. Those minutes cost nothing and save days.

When a scene refuses to work, two moves are worth trying before rewriting it. Give the actors the take without dialogue, or with their own words. And change the lens. Lens changes fix scenes more often than the odds suggest.

The one job you cannot do for yourself

Directing your own script removes your distance from it. You know what the scene means, so you hear the meaning whether or not the performance delivers it. Directing yourself in your own script removes the last of your objectivity. Most first-time directors believe closeness to the material sharpens their judgement. It blunts it.

Fix this structurally. Put someone at the monitor whose taste you trust and who will tell you a moment is not reading. Give them the job out loud, in front of people, on day one. Assume you will resist them at least once and agree in advance to listen anyway.

Back to the two lists

Prep so the day holds fewer open questions. Cast well so performance stops being a problem you solve on set. Cover the scene so your future self has options. Get clean sound because you cannot buy it later. Decide quickly, keep the set moving, feed people, and watch your dailies.

None of this produces the film in your head. It produces a finished film with the material worth keeping. Those are different outcomes and the second one is the one you release.

Sources and further reading

Bong Joon-ho on storyboarding, and the published Parasite storyboards. Robert Altman on casting, 1977. Chloe Zhao on working with non-professional actors. Contemporary accounts of Clint Eastwood's shooting method. Production histories of Jaws. Eryn Newman and Norbert Schwarz, Good Sound, Good Research, Science Communication volume 40 issue 2, 2018.

Translate this page

Machine translation provided by Google Translate, on Google’s servers. We do not check these translations and they will get technical terms wrong. The English page is the authoritative one. Following a link sends this page’s address to Google. Your browser may also offer to translate this page itself, which keeps the request on your device.