Spot, name, and cue replacement lines

Turn a script and locked scene into a precise cue plan that communicates context, timing, performance, and status.

By the end of this module

  • Decide which lines require ADR and why.
  • Create consistent cue identifiers and cue records.
  • Prepare clear visual and audible prompting without obscuring performance.
Six-stage workflow diagram for Spot, name, and cue replacement lines.
Use this workflow to keep technical operations connected to editorial or musical decisions.

Core knowledge

Principles before controls

Every cue needs a reason

Replacement may address intelligibility, performance, continuity, language, safety, or story change. Record the purpose because it guides direction and matching.

Cue boundaries include context

Pre-roll, post-roll, preceding action, breaths, and reactions matter even when only one phrase will be replaced.

Names are workflow contracts

Reel, character, cue number, take, status, and version must remain consistent in markers, clips, files, and reports.

Prompts support rather than dictate

Beep, streamer, text, and visual wipe choices should help timing while leaving room for natural performance.

Guided build / approximately 90-120 minutes

Build it in the application

  1. 1

    Watch the scene once for story and performance without stopping.

  2. 2

    Review production dialogue and mark only lines with a documented replacement need.

  3. 3

    For each cue, define character, text, in/out context, cue reason, production perspective, and emotional action.

  4. 4

    Assign stable identifiers using reel-scene-character-sequence format and never recycle a retired ID.

  5. 5

    Create cue markers with pre-roll and post-roll. Place line text and direction in the cue record rather than overloading marker names.

  6. 6

    Set three-beep or streamer timing from the cue entrance and verify the performer receives an unambiguous fourth-beat entry.

  7. 7

    Prepare alternate text and pronunciation notes separately so the approved line remains identifiable.

  8. 8

    Export the cue sheet and compare every row against the Pro Tools marker and clip naming plan.

Independent challenge / 45-60 minutes

Prove the principle

Spot ten candidate lines, then justify which six truly require ADR and which four should remain production sound. Include story and performance consequences.

Portfolio checkpoint

Evidence to retain

Submit the cue sheet, marker export, and a cue-by-cue decision record with frame-accurate in/out references.

Store this evidence in 01_ADMIN/checkpoints/module-2 and include it in the final decision log.

Failure modes

Diagnose before retrying

Cue numbers change during revision

Keep IDs stable and mark status or version separately. Never renumber all later cues after a deletion.

Beep timing encourages clipped first words

Check pre-roll, performer latency, and the exact implied fourth beat. Allow a natural lead-in where the performance requires it.

Cue text disagrees with picture edit

Confirm the current locked picture version and log the discrepancy before recording.

Working vocabulary

Terms you must be able to explain

spotting
Identifying and defining work required at exact programme locations.
cue ID
A stable identifier connecting line, recording, clip, status, and report.
pre-roll
Context played before a record point.
streamer
A moving visual timing cue that reaches a target at the performance entry.

Primary sources

Verify current behavior

Lesson reviewed 2026-07-13. Verify menus and shortcuts against the lab release.

Translate this page

Machine translation provided by Google Translate, on Google’s servers. We do not check these translations and they will get technical terms wrong. The English page is the authoritative one. Following a link sends this page’s address to Google. Your browser may also offer to translate this page itself, which keeps the request on your device.