Control loudness, peaks, and translation

Measure programme behavior without mixing to a number blindly, then test intelligibility and balance across realistic listening conditions.

By the end of this module

  • Distinguish sample peak, true peak, momentary, short-term, and integrated loudness.
  • Use meters as evidence after listening.
  • Create a delivery-safe master that translates beyond the lab.
Six-stage workflow diagram for Control loudness, peaks, and translation.
The six stages in order: Listen at reference, Measure full programme, Find local failures, Revise balance, Control peaks, Test three systems.

Core knowledge

Principles before controls

Loudness describes a whole experience

Integrated loudness summarizes programme energy, while short-term and momentary readings reveal local behavior.

True peak estimates reconstruction risk

A sample can remain below full scale while reconstructed playback exceeds it. Delivery limits should specify which peak measure applies.

Targets are context dependent

Broadcast, podcast, music, web, and institutional briefs can require different values. Follow the supplied specification.

Translation is a controlled comparison

Use fixed monitor levels and matched playback on headphones, nearfields, and a small speaker instead of compensating unconsciously.

Guided build / approximately 90-120 minutes

Build it in the application

  1. 1

    Reset or remeasure the full programme from beginning to end and record integrated, loudness range, and maximum true peak.

  2. 2

    Mark the loudest short-term section and the quietest intelligible speech section for focused inspection.

  3. 3

    Adjust editorial balance and automation before adding final-bus limiting.

  4. 4

    Use the minimum transparent peak control needed to meet the written ceiling without flattening transients.

  5. 5

    Re-run the complete measurement after every structural or gain change. Do not infer integrated results from a partial pass.

  6. 6

    Listen at the lab reference position, then on headphones and a small mono speaker at matched perceived level.

  7. 7

    Check that speech survives low-level playback and that music or effects do not disappear at normal listening level.

  8. 8

    Repeat the comparison after a short listening break so adaptation does not conceal harshness, masking, or level imbalance.

  9. 9

    Record measurements, meter configuration, software version, and listening systems in the QC report.

Independent challenge / 45-60 minutes

Prove the principle

Create two compliant versions for different supplied delivery briefs without changing the editorial structure. Explain why the processing differs.

Portfolio checkpoint

Evidence to retain

Submit both measured masters, meter screenshots, and a translation table with observations from three playback systems.

Store this evidence in 01_ADMIN/checkpoints/module-5 and include it in the final decision log.

Failure modes

Diagnose before retrying

Integrated loudness changes between passes

Confirm identical start/end points, reset meter history, bypass monitoring-only processing, and check automation.

True peak rises after export

Inspect codec and sample-rate conversion, leave more headroom, and measure the encoded deliverable rather than only the session bus.

Dialogue meets the number but feels buried

Return to spectral masking, arrangement, automation, and intelligibility. Loudness compliance does not guarantee clarity.

Working vocabulary

Terms you must be able to explain

LUFS
A loudness unit referenced to digital full scale.
integrated loudness
Programme loudness accumulated over a measured duration with gating.
true peak
An estimate of peak level after waveform reconstruction.
translation
The degree to which intended relationships survive different playback systems.

Primary sources

Verify current behavior

Lesson reviewed 2026-07-13. Verify menus and shortcuts against the lab release.

Failure in practice

Where this goes wrong

Loudness and peak are separate measurements answering separate questions, and meeting one says nothing about the other. A programme can sit correctly on loudness and still exceed its peak ceiling, which is a rejection rather than a comment. Check both against the specification you were given.

Translation is tested by listening elsewhere rather than by metering. A mix that measures correctly and falls apart on a phone speaker has failed for most of its audience, and the check costs the length of the programme on the worst speaker you own.

Play the programme on a phone speaker end to end. It is the least flattering system your audience uses and the fastest way to find a mix that measures correctly and fails in practice.

Check loudness on the programme as delivered, including any leader, tone and spacing required by the specification. Measuring the content alone gives a different figure from measuring the file, and the file is what gets assessed.

Translate this page

Machine translation provided by Google Translate, on Google’s servers. We do not check these translations and they will get technical terms wrong. The English page is the authoritative one. Following a link sends this page’s address to Google. Your browser may also offer to translate this page itself, which keeps the request on your device.